In a significant development, the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has decided to conclude the ongoing strike by lawyers protesting the recent police lathi-charge on lawyers in the Hapur district. The strike’s resolution came after the State government agreed to meet several demands put forth by the bar body. Here’s a breakdown of the key events and outcomes:
Genesis of the Issue
The issue began with a protest organized by lawyers in response to a police case filed against advocate Priyanka Tyagi. The protest led to an alleged lathi-charge by the police against advocates in Hapur.
The protesting lawyers had several demands, including the quashing of FIRs against them, the suspension or transfer of police officials involved in the lathi-charge, compensation for injured advocates, and the implementation of the Advocates Protection Act in the State.
Government’s Response
The Uttar Pradesh government responded positively to the demands made by the lawyers. They agreed to quash the FIRs against the protesting lawyers and committed to suspending or transferring the police officials responsible for the lathi charge. Additionally, the government assured compensation for the injured advocates and the implementation of the Advocates Protection Act.
Conclusion of Strike
Upon receiving confirmation of the government’s acceptance of their demands, lawyers across the State received messages directing them to resume work from September 16. The Allahabad High Court played an important role with regard to addressing the issue. High Court formed a committee headed by sitting judge Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta to examine the situation.
The strike, which had disrupted judicial work in the State, was ultimately called off as the government acceded to the lawyers’ demands. While the committee led by Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta was set to convene on September 16, the strike concluded before the scheduled meeting.
This development signifies a resolution to a contentious issue that had impacted the legal community in Uttar Pradesh. The willingness of the government to address the concerns of the lawyers and their subsequent return to work marks a positive step towards maintaining the rule of law and ensuring justice for all parties involved.
