NationalCourt Orders Ola to 'Compensate' Rs 5 Lakh for Driver's Sexual Misconduct

Date:

Court Orders Ola to ‘Compensate’ Rs 5 Lakh for Driver’s Sexual Misconduct

In a landmark ruling, the Karnataka High Court has directed ANI Technologies, the parent company of Ola Cabs, to pay Rs 5 lakh in compensation to a woman who allegedly faced sexual harassment by one of their drivers in 2019.

Karnataka HC orders Ola to compensate Sex Harassment victim

This decision, handed down by Justice M G S Kamal, marks a significant development in the ongoing debate over ride-hailing companies’ responsibilities towards passenger safety.

The court’s order goes beyond monetary compensation, mandating Ola’s Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to conduct a thorough inquiry into the incident within 90 days, adhering to the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act). This directive comes after Ola’s initial refusal to investigate the complaint, citing lack of jurisdiction.

Here’s what happened:

Justice Kamal emphasized the importance of confidentiality, instructing all parties to comply with Section 16 of the POSH Act to protect the identities of those involved. The court also ordered ANI Technologies to cover the petitioner’s litigation expenses, amounting to Rs 50,000.

The case has broader implications for the ride-hailing industry in India. The petitioner not only sought redress from Ola but also urged the Ministry of Women and Child Development to ensure the company’s compliance with POSH guidelines. Furthermore, she called on the state to implement protective regulations for women and children using taxi services.

What Karnataka State Road Safety Authority do?

In a related development, the Karnataka State Road Safety Authority has been directed to expedite its proceedings regarding a notice issued to ANI Technologies, with a 90-day deadline. The state government faces a Rs 1 lakh penalty for its inadequate response to the petition.

The case has ignited a debate on the nature of ride-hailing services. While the petitioner’s counsel argued that Ola functions as a transport company and should be responsible for its drivers’ actions, Ola’s legal team contended that drivers are independent contractors, not employees, and thus the company should not be liable under labour laws.

This ruling sets a precedent for how ride-hailing companies might be held accountable for passenger safety in the future, potentially reshaping the industry’s operational model and legal responsibilities.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

FIR Filed as IndiGo Employee Alleges Harassment and Caste-Based Verbal Abuse by Seniors

A 35-year-old IndiGo employee from Bengaluru, identified as Sharan...

Evacuation Mission ‘Operation Sindhu’ Returns 1,700 Indians from Iran; Land Exit Strategy Set for Israel

Amid the escalating conflict involving Israel, India has successfully...

Israeli Authorities Reveal Iran’s Strategy Before Trump-Ordered Strikes

The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran was among...

Is That Really Govinda? Actor’s New Moustached Look Sparks Confusion

New photos of 90s Bollywood icon Govinda have taken...